I preferred a standalone LCD for this project rather than a shield as it was more satisfying for me, and allowed me to easily see which pins were available. The LCD is plugged into a breadboard and then hookup wires are connected from the breadboard to the appropriate pins on the Arduino (see step 2 if you have any questions on the connections I used). The assignments I used for connecting the LCD to the UNO can be seen above. However, an experimental platform is not needed, although for me it makes connecting the LCD to the UNO much easier and quicker.
VOLUME SCROLL ONE AT A TIME HOW TO
(See an earlier Instructable of mine, “ Experimental Platform For the Arduino UNO R3, How To Prepare It For Use “). I used an “experimental platform” to connect the Arduino UNO to a half-size, 400 tie points, breadboard. A 1602 standalone LCD display was used in this Instructable, but as noted a 1602 shield can be used as well if the different pin assignments are taken into account.
VOLUME SCROLL ONE AT A TIME CODE
For the LCD shield, I use the following pin assignments in my sketches, and also included the Liquid Crystal library LiquidCrystal.h.Įither route will run the code here, i.e., either a LCD shield or a standalone LCD. LiquidCrystal (rs, enable, d4, d5, d6, d7)Īnd included the Liquid Crystal library LiquidCrystal.h. For the independent 1602 LCD display I used the following pin assignments in my sketches: If that is the case, then the pin assignments for the LCD in the sketch below will need to be changed. In addition to an LCD you will need an Arduino UNO or clone, the Arduino IDE, and a USB cable to connect the Arduino to a computer.Īn LCD shield can be used instead of the standalone LCD shown here. The items required are an LCD screen either 1602 or 2004. An experimental platform (optional, but helpful) A half-size, 400 tie points, breadboard A USB cable to connect the Arduino to a computer See note below regarding use of a 2004 LCD display But.- A 1602 or 2004 LCD standalone display, or LCD shield You'd THINK a big, successful company like Amazon could do better than this.
It's like the Amazon Music UI team have never used other streamers OR desktop music players - or even taken any classes in UI design or UX enhancement.
(You can page up/down one screen at a time, but if you have half a day's plays in the queue, that's a HUGE PITA.) (I'm tempted to characterize those decisions less charitably but they DID just fix the multi-select queue drag and drop bug that was introduced in the makeover update.)īut, I have to say, it really makes NO SENSE whatsoever to hide the volume control.īut they like HIDING stuff: for instance, you can't clear the queue without opening that interface - and THEN they moved the 'clear queue' button from a fixed header position to a position at the top of THE (scrolling) QUEUE PAGE - so, if you're not at the top of the queue, you have to blinking SCROLL all the way up - and NO shortcut conventions like ctrl-page up or anything useful like that. The Amazon Music UI team makes some really weird design decisions, I have to say. It's now 'behind' the speaker icon (that also allows access to Exclusive Mode if your gear is compatible).
0 kommentar(er)
